Links between Vaccine Ingredients & Autism: Media suppression of Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” article

updated

bikedog

Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” Article Apparently Retracted from Slate”

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/was-robert-f-kennedy-jrs-deadly-immunity-retracted-from-salon-by-arthur-allens-wife-and-her-brother.html

Copy of Original Article
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm
PDF placeholder

The tsunami of folks damaged by the medical-establishment continues building -likely an unforseen calamity of immense proportions to this perverse public health strategy.  This strategy – driven by profits, highly suspect science and questionable ethics, has many earmarks of less than benign forces. Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex taking over things; now we have the Medical Industrial Complex.  It appears to operate with the same degree of secrecy, impunity, and lack of governmental or critical scientific oversight

 As Blaylock (I think) put it, paraphrasing- “vaccination is chemical rape, often of the innocents”.  

 Manufactured “scientific statistics” has been ongoing for the better part of the last 20-25 yrs with HIV/AIDS “epidemics” in Africa.  Rather than the guise of vaccinations (although that may likely occur as well), the ruse has been coercive compliance with…

View original post 41 more words

Advertisements

Links between Vaccine Ingredients & Autism: Media suppression of Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” article

Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” Article Apparently Retracted from Slate”

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/was-robert-f-kennedy-jrs-deadly-immunity-retracted-from-salon-by-arthur-allens-wife-and-her-brother.html

Copy of Original Article
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm
PDF placeholder

The tsunami of folks damaged by the medical-establishment continues building -likely an unforseen calamity of immense proportions to this perverse public health strategy.  This strategy – driven by profits, highly suspect science and questionable ethics, has many earmarks of less than benign forces. Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex taking over things; now we have the Medical Industrial Complex.  It appears to operate with the same degree of secrecy, impunity, and lack of governmental or critical scientific oversight

 As Blaylock (I think) put it, paraphrasing- “vaccination is chemical rape, often of the innocents”.  

 Manufactured “scientific statistics” has been ongoing for the better part of the last 20-25 yrs with HIV/AIDS “epidemics” in Africa.  Rather than the guise of vaccinations (although that may likely occur as well), the ruse has been coercive compliance with taking antiretroviral (repackaged chemotherapy agents) drugs & HIV testing.

Blaylock reported on this ((links between neurological damage, vaccination, immune response and vaccine ingredients) in 2004.
http://www.whale.to/a/blaylock.html
PDF placeholder

Sentinel report in Blaylock
NJ study reported to CDC in 1995
(insert link)

Vaccines didn’t & probably won’t save us – look at the data

Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics
Source:  http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/
     An interesting perspective on the incidence of childhood disease over the last 200 years for UK, US & Australia.  Diseases were well on the decline due to better public health practices, water treatment, and wealth increases in these countries.  Measles and mumps vaccinations, in particular, had been identified  as unnecessary by UK in late 1970’s- at least it was being questioned.
download pdf

Where is the science showing potential dangers from excess vaccinations &
what would be the likely immune/neurological responses?
Blaylock 2008 has an interesting article & viewpoint with 105 references.

US Gov’t has been quietly settling many vaccine-caused neurological damage cases
What would be interesting to know is why aren’t the companies that make these vaccines being held liable.

 Andrew Wakefield’s Responses Published -from childhealthsafety:
“rubella virus is one of the few known causes of autism.” US Center for Disease Control.
“FAQs (frequently asked questions) about MMR Vaccine & Autism”  [ED 8/Apr/12: This is the web archive of the CDC page – you will need to search in or scroll down the page to see the text.  As papers cited on the original page by the CDC as evidence for no link with the vaccine have been steadily discredited it seems the CDC has decided to remove the page and it seems someone has been deleting the archived versions of the page from the web archive too].
Journal references:
1. Chess, S. Autism in children with congenital rubella. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1, 33-47 (1971).
2. Chess S. Follow-up report on autism in congenital rubella. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1977;7:69 –81
3. Ziring PR. Congenital rubella: the teenage years. Pediatr Ann. 1997;6: 762–770

 

Walker et al, 2013 New Publication showing autism &  gut issues, appears to be a solid study.

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058058&representation=PDF

MMR-Autism: A new paradigm, or at least a shifting one.

MMR Vaccination – Autism / ASD appear linked: The new paradigm May 2013

Supression of thought: I wonder if this is how varied repressive institutions operate to maintain intellectual control.  The reason the ‘net is so slow today is because all the folks with vaccine-damaged kids are lawyering up and putting down deposits to get attorneys on retainer or maybe a boatload of FB traffic on the NVIC fan page.

Seems that blocking stories such as these in order to protect long entrenched medical ideologies, moneyed interests, and perhaps delay legal actions probably isn’t a good idea.

http://worldtruth.tv/italian-court-rules-mmr-vaccine-caused-autism-us-media-blacks-out-story/

http://truthbarrier.com/2013/05/17/mmr-bombshell-from-wakefield/

Been vetted by a number of corroborated peer-reviewed studies, latest one was from Wake Forest university in 2006 & 2013 timeframes. Many peer reviewed articles/podcasts available & discussions.
 
It is frankly amazing that Italy whose intellectual and scientific heritage includes:
1.  Gallileo (excommunicated for his astronomical views) and DaVinci
2. An incomprehensible legal system failure to properly convict corrupt/immoral politician (Berlisconi) 
3. Established the Mafia

had the social integrity to return a court finding establishing a causal link between MMR vaccination & autism.

obtaining medical rights

Reobtaining or obtaining medical rights for children Zita Lazzarini & Lori Rosales wrote an insightful, well researched article for the Yale Journal of Law, etc.

http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol3/iss1/3 [http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol3/iss1/3]

> While they do spend a fair amount of time delving into reasons why ART advice should be heeded, they also deal quite extensively about recent successful cases where pregnant HIV+ women/new mothers have been able to refuse ART/drugs for themselves & newborns. The take home msg appears, as a women’s reproductive & health issue, State-forced ART treatment (maybe vaccinations) violates basic women’s/mother choice & ability to make medical decisions for themselves & infants.

I don’t know much about HIV law & treatment consent, but the article contains several state-specific cases; so it seems more likely that showing similarities to certain cases as a way to obtain medical custody. If a legal team can pivot the ART or likely _any medical_ issue from public health/public risk to one focused on the “violating basic human/woman’s/mother rights” and ‘informed consent’, the establishment would cave in fairly quickly & you’d be free (or more free) to make your own informed medical choices.

Thus, judges (publicly elected, right?) lean towards case dismissal & more unilateral, independent medical choices for plaintiffs likely.

HIV transmission risk lowered by continual breastfeeding

Study showing increased risk of HIV transmission from HIV+ mother to infant with interrupted breastfeeding relative to continual breastfeeding.  Wonder why this study was done in Zambia and why was there ‘abrupt weaning. Non exclusive breastfeeding implies some additional populational issues in play.
Some 
conclusions: A) if an HIV+ mother chooses to breastfeed her newborn, forced removal or weaning increases HIV transmission to infant risk if the mother resumes breastfeeding, B)state-forced removal would seem to be a risky option and not advisable C) still seem to consider breast milk as ‘dangerous’.

It makes me wonder what is being measured in the final analyses; yet another problem with the models associated with predicting HIV spread.

HIV-1 Concentrations in Human Breast Milk Before and After Weaning
Louise Kuhn1 et al.
Link:
 
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/5/181/181ra51

Abstract
Concentrations of HIV-1 RNA and DNA in mucosal compartments influence the risk of sexual transmission and mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. Breast milk production is physiologically regulated such that supply is a function of infant demand, but whether demand also influences HIV-1 dynamics in breast milk is unknown. We tested whether minor and major changes in feeding frequency influence breast milk viral concentrations in 958 HIV-1–infected women and their infants followed, for 24 months during a trial in Lusaka, Zambia. Women were randomized to wean abruptly at 4 months or to continue breast-feeding for a duration of their own choosing. Two weeks after breast-feeding cessation (4.5 months), HIV-1 concentrations in breast milk were substantially higher (median RNA, 2708 copies/ml; DNA, 14 copies/ml) than if breast-feeding continued (median RNA, <50 copies/ml; DNA, <1 copy/ml; P < 0.0001).
Among those continuing breast-feeding, HIV-1 concentrations in milk were higher if breast-feeding was nonexclusive (median RNA, 293 copies/ml; DNA, 2 copies/ml; P = 0.0006). Elevated milk viral concentrations after stopping breast-feeding explained higher than expected rates of late postnatal HIV transmission in those who weaned early.  Changes in the frequency of breast-feeding peri-weaning and with nonexclusive breast-feeding influenced milk viral concentrations.
This may explain the reduced risk of HIV-1 transmission associated with exclusive breast-feeding and why early weaning does not achieve the magnitude of HIV prevention predicted by models. Our results support continuation of maternal antiretroviral drug interventions over the full duration of time when any breast milk exposures may occur after planned weaning.
Copyright © 2013, American Association for the Advancement of Science

 

AZT & ART – Beldeu Singh article

Beldeu Singh has written an insightful article on how AZT acts as an AIDS chemotherapeutic agent within the body/cells, questions about perceived necessity for HIV suppression, and how IRIS occurs.

 http://aras.ab.ca/articles/scientific/AZT_ART_ImmuneRestoration_BeldeuSingh.pdf

 In general & in my opinion, the PERTH Group & the Alberta Reappraising AIDS Society (ARAS) have provided some solid rigorous science as well as some pointed questions about how HIV & AIDS should be viewed.