CDC nonsense revisited… Again

source: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1165664

Come on, this is classic. It appears to be yet another textbook case of defaming the messenger (Hooker) and massaging/suppressing the message (Thompson walking back his intent- vaccines don’t cause autism).  Celia Farber, of all people, probably recognizes this technique. Maybe Thompson’s lawyer is playing both sides- reveal a bit (data was omitted or surpressed)  but mostly indicate that Dr Thompson was duped (didn’t know he was recorded) and/or stands by vaccines.  This way everyone everyone gets something and can parse out information in statements.  Anyway, by suppressing community commons-public domain information and more objective research, CDC and public health officials have, for years, effectively controlled, managed and massaged the message.  This is the kind of thing that WikiLeaks, DemandProgress, Anonymous, etc have been trying to fight for awhile.The journal where Hooker’s (2014) study was recently published has ‘retracted it’; this is fundamentally no different from what was done with Wakefield’s autism (1998) and Seralini’s glyphosate papers.  The journals bowed to economic (ie, funding, advertising, research, editorial) pressures to basically suppress publicly funded and properly conducted scientific research findings.  This is most curious since Dr Hooker has published many times over the years, most likely the article was peer-reviewed before publication, and Dr Hooker at least has provided a template for addressing this type of public health science.Why did the journal retract the article and likely bow to economic forces?

Because this kind of information essentially threatens moneyed, powerful interests and exposes them to many interesting legal (and ethical) questions. Also, this may be the result when publicly-funded research becomes essentially privatized and, rather than objective science truly resulting, becomes fundamentally beholden to the funding group(s).  This is how tobacco science operated for 50 years.  So, because we as a society have rolled back basic research funding and government size- essentially privatized many things that perhaps should have much tighter oversight and/or control, remain in the public domain, etc; we’ve essentially traded objective, easily obtainable information for some measure of false security, limited information access, and acquired a misplaced trust in the system.  Unfortunately the system has become corrupt and we, as a society, currently remain clueless about how to fix it.

Anyway, back to the issue at hand
===========================
A data bias was identified in a Cochrane report (link below) back in 2005 about DeStefano’s  (2003) original work.  So there was a suspicion or recognition long ago that this DeStefano et al. 2003 paper was flawed.

Further, Hinjen and DeSoto (2013) used DeStefano’s and Price’s varied papers and their data (same data set) to determine that they were improperly biasing data and improper design. When a research study is used in a statistics book as a classic example of data bias and improper statistics, that can’t be a good thing.  For a high profile outfit like the CDC and their funding pipelines, this is a PR disaster.  Thus, DeStefano et al have a ‘track record’ of manipulating their data to get the results that they want (or need).  In this case, it plays towards factors employing large scale (enforced) vaccination as a public health strategy.  This likely sits well with the groups funding this ‘research’ as they also likely profit from both vaccine sales _and_ varied aids to manage/control adverse effects.

Hooker has long been critical of DeStefano’s work (link below).  Since his 2014 paper, which began this latest CDC spin cycle, has been ‘suspended or retracted’ by the Journal, I thought it might be helpful to post a link.

Links
=========
Cochrane 2005 : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3/abstract;jsessionid=6FE0084412306C5E4EE4D7C16F32E848.f02t02

Hooker 2013 criticism: http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/can-we-trust-the-cdc-claim-that-there-is-no-link-between-vaccines-and-autism/

DeSoto/Hinjen 2013: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/41866/InTech-Vaccine_safety_study_as_an_interesti ng_case_of_over_matching_.pdf

Hooker 2014 paper: http://www.rescuepost.com/files/measles-mumps-rubella-vaccination-timing-and-autism-among-young-african-american-boys_-a-reanalysis-of-cdc-data—2047-9158-3-16.pdf

Missed cues on anthropogenic causes of human disease, new insights into climate change and suppression of objective science

Some recent posts on the AgeofAutism.com website concerning autism and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and perhaps chemical causation intrigued me enough to do some additional reading.

Specifically, the link  AofA polio/DDT published in 2011 caused me to embark on a rather circuitous path that eventually led to investigation of human health developments since the 1970/1980’s time frame.  There is a curious apparent synergy that also coincides with a former Mons@nto researcher quickly being placed in an editorial position at Elsevier after the Seralini paper (2012) attracted considerable attention, negative press and eventual retraction. It has curious and unnerving similarities to the processes which led to the Wakefield 1998 Lancet paper retraction and continued lawsuits,

My Reading Sequence:

1. Janine Roberts (initial polio/DDT connections, 2004)
2. Jim West (pre Roberts version of polio causality, 2003)
2A MS Biskind and Scobey papers (1949-1953)
2B Rachel Carson (Silent Spring, 1962)

3. Blaxill/Olmsted (AofA polio/DDT connection, 2011
4. BlaxillOlmsted (CA polio cases, 2014 -1)
5. Blaxill/Olmsted (CA polio cases 2014 -2)
6. Blaxill/Olmsted (CA polio cases 2014-3, link unreachable- to be updated)

7. Temekes (2012-2013 neonicotinoid pesticide PPT/information)
8. Seralini (2012, retracted paper linking glyphosate w/ mammalian health effects)
8A. Seralini 2012-13 (2014 comments to reviewers, answers to questions)

9.   Samsel and Seneff (2013 glyphosate and human health Entropy paper)
10. Seneff (W A Price Conference Feb 2014 powerpoint)

11. Mason 2014 data on glyphosate/worldwide human health

Each one of these links represents an interesting body of collective knowledge which has deep implications about human health degradation, economics,  and global ecosystem dysfunctioning, including climate change.

Suggestion: Seneff powerpt (10), Samsel & Seneff (9), Mason (11), and then go from there.
Dietary revisions as needed: go organic, gluten free, perhaps medication revisions, sunlight, exercise regimen, limited vaccination(s).

Links between Vaccine Ingredients & Autism: Media suppression of Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” article

updated

bikedog

Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” Article Apparently Retracted from Slate”

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/was-robert-f-kennedy-jrs-deadly-immunity-retracted-from-salon-by-arthur-allens-wife-and-her-brother.html

Copy of Original Article
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm
PDF placeholder

The tsunami of folks damaged by the medical-establishment continues building -likely an unforseen calamity of immense proportions to this perverse public health strategy.  This strategy – driven by profits, highly suspect science and questionable ethics, has many earmarks of less than benign forces. Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex taking over things; now we have the Medical Industrial Complex.  It appears to operate with the same degree of secrecy, impunity, and lack of governmental or critical scientific oversight

 As Blaylock (I think) put it, paraphrasing- “vaccination is chemical rape, often of the innocents”.  

 Manufactured “scientific statistics” has been ongoing for the better part of the last 20-25 yrs with HIV/AIDS “epidemics” in Africa.  Rather than the guise of vaccinations (although that may likely occur as well), the ruse has been coercive compliance with…

View original post 41 more words

Links between Vaccine Ingredients & Autism: Media suppression of Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” article

Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” Article Apparently Retracted from Slate”

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/was-robert-f-kennedy-jrs-deadly-immunity-retracted-from-salon-by-arthur-allens-wife-and-her-brother.html

Copy of Original Article
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm
PDF placeholder

The tsunami of folks damaged by the medical-establishment continues building -likely an unforseen calamity of immense proportions to this perverse public health strategy.  This strategy – driven by profits, highly suspect science and questionable ethics, has many earmarks of less than benign forces. Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex taking over things; now we have the Medical Industrial Complex.  It appears to operate with the same degree of secrecy, impunity, and lack of governmental or critical scientific oversight

 As Blaylock (I think) put it, paraphrasing- “vaccination is chemical rape, often of the innocents”.  

 Manufactured “scientific statistics” has been ongoing for the better part of the last 20-25 yrs with HIV/AIDS “epidemics” in Africa.  Rather than the guise of vaccinations (although that may likely occur as well), the ruse has been coercive compliance with taking antiretroviral (repackaged chemotherapy agents) drugs & HIV testing.

Blaylock reported on this ((links between neurological damage, vaccination, immune response and vaccine ingredients) in 2004.
http://www.whale.to/a/blaylock.html
PDF placeholder

Sentinel report in Blaylock
NJ study reported to CDC in 1995
(insert link)

Vaccines didn’t & probably won’t save us – look at the data

Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics
Source:  http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/
     An interesting perspective on the incidence of childhood disease over the last 200 years for UK, US & Australia.  Diseases were well on the decline due to better public health practices, water treatment, and wealth increases in these countries.  Measles and mumps vaccinations, in particular, had been identified  as unnecessary by UK in late 1970’s- at least it was being questioned.
download pdf

Where is the science showing potential dangers from excess vaccinations &
what would be the likely immune/neurological responses?
Blaylock 2008 has an interesting article & viewpoint with 105 references.

US Gov’t has been quietly settling many vaccine-caused neurological damage cases
What would be interesting to know is why aren’t the companies that make these vaccines being held liable.

 Andrew Wakefield’s Responses Published -from childhealthsafety:
“rubella virus is one of the few known causes of autism.” US Center for Disease Control.
“FAQs (frequently asked questions) about MMR Vaccine & Autism”  [ED 8/Apr/12: This is the web archive of the CDC page – you will need to search in or scroll down the page to see the text.  As papers cited on the original page by the CDC as evidence for no link with the vaccine have been steadily discredited it seems the CDC has decided to remove the page and it seems someone has been deleting the archived versions of the page from the web archive too].
Journal references:
1. Chess, S. Autism in children with congenital rubella. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1, 33-47 (1971).
2. Chess S. Follow-up report on autism in congenital rubella. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1977;7:69 –81
3. Ziring PR. Congenital rubella: the teenage years. Pediatr Ann. 1997;6: 762–770

 

Walker et al, 2013 New Publication showing autism &  gut issues, appears to be a solid study.

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058058&representation=PDF

MMR-Autism: A new paradigm, or at least a shifting one.

MMR Vaccination – Autism / ASD appear linked: The new paradigm May 2013

Supression of thought: I wonder if this is how varied repressive institutions operate to maintain intellectual control.  The reason the ‘net is so slow today is because all the folks with vaccine-damaged kids are lawyering up and putting down deposits to get attorneys on retainer or maybe a boatload of FB traffic on the NVIC fan page.

Seems that blocking stories such as these in order to protect long entrenched medical ideologies, moneyed interests, and perhaps delay legal actions probably isn’t a good idea.

http://worldtruth.tv/italian-court-rules-mmr-vaccine-caused-autism-us-media-blacks-out-story/

http://truthbarrier.com/2013/05/17/mmr-bombshell-from-wakefield/

Been vetted by a number of corroborated peer-reviewed studies, latest one was from Wake Forest university in 2006 & 2013 timeframes. Many peer reviewed articles/podcasts available & discussions.
 
It is frankly amazing that Italy whose intellectual and scientific heritage includes:
1.  Gallileo (excommunicated for his astronomical views) and DaVinci
2. An incomprehensible legal system failure to properly convict corrupt/immoral politician (Berlisconi) 
3. Established the Mafia

had the social integrity to return a court finding establishing a causal link between MMR vaccination & autism.